Rewrite the company story so it survived the buyer's first scroll, the sales rep's first call, and the investor's first question — with the same words across all three. Stop describing the product. Start naming what the buyer was actually trying to fix.
Buyer interviews to extract the language customers actually use. Messaging hierarchy from category claim down to individual product callouts. Sales enablement — talk tracks, objection handling, demo flow rewrites. Alignment with investor-relations language so earnings calls and customer calls told the same story.
Sales adopted the new language without a six-week training cycle, because it sounded like the buyer rather than the engineer. Investor decks and customer decks pointed at the same outcome. The company stopped talking about itself in spec-sheet vocabulary and started talking in buyer-outcome vocabulary.
The challenge
A NASDAQ-listed B2B SaaS company had a product that performed in technical evaluations and a story that died on the buyer's first scroll. Engineering-fluent leadership had built positioning that read like a spec sheet — precise, accurate, and unable to survive the moment a non-technical buyer landed on the page. Sales reps were quietly translating the official messaging into something they could actually say in front of a customer, and every rep was translating it differently.
The complication: a public company doesn't get to A/B test its story in front of investors. Whatever language we landed on for sales had to be the same language that showed up in earnings calls, on the IR page, and in the analyst Q&A. The brief was wide and the constraint was narrow at the same time.
What I did
This wasn't a rebrand and it wasn't a website refresh. It was a messaging engagement — the underlying story the whole company tells about itself.
Buyer interviews to extract the actual vocabulary
- Talked to active customers, lost prospects, and the sales reps who had been quietly translating the official messaging
- Pulled out the words the buyers themselves used to describe what they were trying to solve — not what the product does, but what the buyer was hired to fix
- Identified the moments in the buyer journey where the official messaging dropped out and rep-invented language took over
Messaging hierarchy from category down to product
- Top-level category claim — one sentence the founder, the CMO, and the analyst could all repeat without rehearsing
- Three pillars underneath the category claim — the buyer-facing reasons this category exists and why this company is the answer
- Product-level callouts written to feed every pillar without repeating spec-sheet language
Sales reps quietly inventing their own pitch? Book your free 30-min slot →
Sales enablement and investor alignment
- Talk tracks per persona — a single page each, built from the buyer interviews so reps recognized the language as theirs
- Objection handling for the three objections the win/loss data flagged most often
- Demo flow rewrites so the demo opens with a buyer outcome, not a feature tour
- Worked with the IR team to make sure the same category claim and pillars showed up in earnings narrative and analyst materials — one story, both rooms
The outcome
Sales adopted the new language without a six-week training cycle, because it sounded like the buyer rather than the engineer. Investor materials and customer materials pointed at the same outcome — no more "the company we describe to Wall Street isn't the company we sell." The company stopped talking about itself in spec-sheet vocabulary and started talking in buyer-outcome vocabulary. The product hadn't changed. The story finally caught up to it.
Our product was good. Our story was an internal monologue. She made us write the story the buyer was already telling us — and then made sure the same story landed in front of investors and on the website. We sound like ourselves now, only louder and clearer.
.jpg?width=72&height=72&name=Shani%20Headshots-7710%20(1).jpg)